Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-11-02 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, getting a overall score of 80.3 against 77.2. Google Nexus 6P is an extremely older cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, but Google was able to build it just a little bit lighter and thinner anyway. Google Nexus 6P counts with a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Nexus 6P has a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 256 GB.
Google Nexus 6P has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a better 12.3 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features just a bit longer battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.