Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| -- | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.09 ounces |
| Obsidian and Porcelain | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 514 pixels per inch |
| 2700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is better than the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), with an 87.1 score against 76.7. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a way better looking display than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a much smaller screen. The Galaxy Note9 features a much better hardware performance than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 16% bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 takes clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.