Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than the LG V20, having an 82.5 score against 77. Although Google Pixel 2 XL is newer than the LG V20, it is a little thicker and just a bit heavier. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a little bit better screen than LG V20, because it has a just a little greater screen pixels density, a quite larger display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG V20, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has more CPU cores. The LG V20 counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V20 has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a F1.8 camera aperture, the LG V20 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 3520mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Google Pixel 2 XL costs more money than LG V20, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.