Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 2 XL's general score of 82.5. The LG V50 ThinQ is a newer phone than Google Pixel 2 XL, but it is just a little thicker and just a little heavier. The LG V50 ThinQ features a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slightly higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a quite larger display. The LG V50 ThinQ takes slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with a lower 12 MP resolution, and they both have a 0.38 inches sensor, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ has a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3520mAh.
Although LG V50 ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 2 XL. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 2 XL, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.