Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having a global score of 82.5 against 76.4. Google Pixel 2 XL's body is much newer, just a little lighter and a lot thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a sharper screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Motorola Droid Turbo shoots clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images and videos and worse 24 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a much better memory to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Droid Turbo features a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3520mAh.
Google Pixel 2 XL is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.