Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 152.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus, having an 82.5 score against 79.7. The Google Pixel 2 XL design is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G Stylus, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880px resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit superior processing unit than Moto G Stylus. Both have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Moto G Stylus features a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Moto G Stylus has a superior camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also has a much more MP camera in the back, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.