Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro has a score of 93.3, which is better than Google Pixel 2's global score of 81.6. IPhone 13 Pro's design is noticeably newer and a little bit thinner than the Google Pixel 2's, but it's also incredibly heavier. Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a superior processing power than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 2 less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and more RAM.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a much better display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a higher 1170 x 2532 resolution, a larger display and a little greater pixels quantity per display inch. IPhone 13 Pro's memory capacity to install games and applications is just as good as the Google Pixel 2 one, they have the same 128 GB internal memory.
IPhone 13 Pro takes clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3095mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 2, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.