Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is better than the Google Pixel 2, with a 93.2 score against 81.6. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max body is noticeably newer and just a little thinner, but also noticeably heavier than the Google Pixel 2. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a superior performance than Google Pixel 2, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max features just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a little bit better display pixel density, a lot bigger screen and a better 1284 x 2778 resolution. The iPhone 13 Pro Max's memory capacity for games and applications is just as good as Google Pixel 2's one, both have equal internal storage capacity.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 61 percent more battery size. IPhone 13 Pro Max takes slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone 13 Pro Max, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 2, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.