Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 2, with an 88.1 score against 81.6. Although Apple iPhone X and the Google Pixel 2 were released with only a couple of months difference, Apple iPhone X's construction is a little bit thinner but somewhat heavier. The iPhone X counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a larger display, a slightly better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The iPhone X has a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Apple iPhone X has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The iPhone X takes clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition, a smaller sensor and a back facing camera with less MP resolution, they both have the same camera aperture. The iPhone X features a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 1 percent bigger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 2, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.