Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel's 80.2 global score. The Google Pixel 2 design has the same weight than Google Pixel, but it's just a little bit thinner. Google Pixel 2 has a slightly better screen than Google Pixel. They have a display with the same size, a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and the same exact resolution of 1080 x 1920.
Google Pixel's memory capacity to store more apps and games is just as good as Google Pixel 2's one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 2 has a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Google Pixel 2 also has a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The Google Pixel features a camera that is very similar to Google Pixel 2's camera, because although the Google Pixel has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photos and a more mega-pixels camera.
Google Pixel features just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 2770mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 2 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.