Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 score. Even though the Google Pixel 2 is older than the Google Pixel 3a, it's design is just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better display than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, they both have the same pixels density. Google Pixel 2 features a much better storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 2 and Google Pixel 3a feature quite similar cameras, and although the Google Pixel 3a has a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a camera in the back with a 12.2 MP resolution, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate.
The Google Pixel 2 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.