Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-06-25 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the Honor 50 Pro's 77 general score. The Google Pixel 2 design has the same thickness than Honor 50 Pro, but it is extremely lighter. Honor 50 Pro features a screen that is very similar to the Google Pixel 2 one, because although the Honor 50 Pro has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a better 1236 x 2676 resolution and a really larger screen.
Honor 50 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. The Honor 50 Pro features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Honor 50 Pro has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh. The Honor 50 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.