Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2024-03-22 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 441 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a global score of 92.1, which is better than Google Pixel 2's general score of 81.6. Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is much newer than the Google Pixel 2, it is much heavier and somewhat thicker. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a much larger display, a higher 1280 x 2800 resolution and a quite better pixels number in each display inch.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a superior storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has more internal storage capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a little better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 107% greater battery capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a lot larger aperture to capture better low-light images, a much bigger camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality, a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and faster video frame rate.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 2, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.