Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| -- | Android, HTC Sense UI |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-01-17 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 441 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than the HTC U11 EYEs, having a general score of 81.6 against 76.9. Although Google Pixel 2 and the HTC U11 EYEs were only released 3 months apart, Google Pixel 2 is a lot lighter and a little bit thinner. Google Pixel 2 has a little bit better processing power than HTC U11 EYEs. They have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little sharper screen than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit better screen density. The Google Pixel 2 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking images and video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a back camera with more megapixels.
The HTC U11 EYEs has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The HTC U11 EYEs features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3930mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.