Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-06-01 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ, having an 81.6 score against 81. The Google Pixel 2 construction has the same thickness than the LG G7 ThinQ, but it's somewhat lighter. LG G7 ThinQ has a sharper display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a greater pixel count in each inch of screen and a bigger screen.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a very superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with just a little better performance than Google Pixel 2. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 11% more battery capacity. The LG G7 ThinQ shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same video resolution, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a way better 16 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and faster video frame rates.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 2 is also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.