Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than the LG K52, with a overall score of 81.6 against 76. Google Pixel 2's body is noticeably lighter and just a little bit thinner than LG K52, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. LG K52 counts with a CPU that's just as good as Google Pixel 2's processor, both have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a more vivid display than LG K52, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 resolution and a way higher number of pixels per screen inch. The LG K52 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size diafragm aperture and the same (Full HD) video definition, the LG K52 also has a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a way more mega-pixels back camera.
The LG K52 features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K52 counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.