Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is just a bit better than Google Pixel 2, getting an 85.4 score against 81.6. The LG K92 design is incredibly newer, but a little bit thicker and much heavier than Google Pixel 2. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little faster processing unit than LG K92, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Google Pixel 2 has a little sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels density. The LG K92 captures much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video quality and a same size camera aperture, the LG K92 also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
The LG K92 features a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG K92 counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 48% bigger battery capacity.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 2. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 2, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.