Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than the LG Q70, getting a score of 81.6 against 77.9. The Google Pixel 2 is an much older device than the LG Q70, but it's lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. The Google Pixel 2 has just a bit better processing power than LG Q70. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Google Pixel 2 features a bit sharper display than LG Q70, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater quantity of pixels in each screen inch. The LG Q70 takes a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a F1.8 aperture, the LG Q70 also counts with a back camera with way more mega pixels.
The LG Q70 has a very superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Google Pixel 2 is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.