Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than LG Stylo 6's overall score of 76.7. Google Pixel 2 is an way older phone than the LG Stylo 6, but it is notably lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little sharper display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels count per display inch.
The LG Stylo 6 counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6's CPU is just as good as the Google Pixel 2 one, both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Google Pixel 2 takes clearer photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a less megapixels back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a bigger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and a way higher video definition.
The LG Stylo 6 has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.