Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 2's 81.6 score. LG V30S ThinQ's design is a little thinner but a little heavier than the Google Pixel 2, and both were released only 5 months apart. LG V30S ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution, a bit better pixel count in each display inch and a larger display.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with greater battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 22 percent more battery capacity. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a much higher 16 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2. If you want to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 2, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.