Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having an 81.6 score against 81.3. Although Google Pixel 2 and LG V35 ThinQ were released with only 8 months difference, Google Pixel 2's body is just a little thicker but a bit lighter than LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880, a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a bigger display.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 16 mega-pixels resolution and a larger camera aperture for better low light images.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has improved battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 2 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.