Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ, getting an 81.6 score against 81.2. Despite of the fact Google Pixel 2 is older and a bit thicker than LG V40 ThinQ, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. LG V40 ThinQ features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a little more pixels per inch of display and a larger display.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a much better memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with improved battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2700mAh. The LG V40 ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with less MP resolution, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Google Pixel 2 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.