Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a global score of 87.6, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 2's global score of 81.6. LG V60 ThinQ is a noticeably newer cellphone than the Google Pixel 2, but it is way heavier and somewhat thicker. Google Pixel 2 features a bit sharper screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a little better screen density.
LG V60 ThinQ features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh. LG V60 ThinQ shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a much higher video resolution, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a way larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 2. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy LG V60 ThinQ, else you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 2, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.