Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 2's global score of 81.6. LG Velvet is a extremely heavier device than the Google Pixel 2, but they are equally thin. Google Pixel 2 features a bit more vivid screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG Velvet features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG Velvet shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Velvet also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
LG Velvet features a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Although LG Velvet is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 2. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy LG Velvet, otherwise you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 2, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.