Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is much better than the Google Pixel 2, having a global score of 91.2 against 81.6. Although LG Wing is newer than the Google Pixel 2, it's notably heavier and incredibly thicker. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a slightly better display than LG Wing, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel count in each inch in the screen.
LG Wing counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG Wing counts with a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has more RAM memory.
LG Wing has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. LG Wing has a way better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the LG Wing also has faster video frame rates, a back facing camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor shooting much higher quality photos and videos.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy LG Wing, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 2, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.