Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2015-10-27 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with a overall score of 81.6 against 74.8. Google Pixel 2 is a newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of screen, a quite bigger display and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 2 has a more powerful processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 1 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (and also faster). The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking images and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a superior memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 39 percent greater battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 2 is also cheaper than the other phone, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.