Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has a general score of 89.6, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 2's general score of 81.6. The Motorola edge design is a lot newer, but thicker and way heavier than the Google Pixel 2. The Google Pixel 2 features a bit better screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel count per inch in the display.
The Motorola edge has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Motorola edge has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola edge also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola edge has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2700mAh. Motorola edge counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola edge also has a back facing camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a way larger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Motorola edge, otherwise you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 2, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.