Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 general score. The Google Pixel 2 is a noticeably older and a little thicker device than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but Google managed to make it somewhat lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 2 features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution, a lot larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures and a lot better video definition.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's memory to store more games and applications is very similar to the Google Pixel 2 one, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.