Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having a overall score of 81.6 against 80.9. The Google Pixel 2 is an extremely older cellphone than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but Google managed to build it just a little thinner and way lighter. Google Pixel 2 has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a lot bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting images and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a way higher resolution back camera.
Google Pixel 2 and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra both count with really similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.