Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a bit better than Google Pixel 2, having an 83.4 score against 81.6. Although the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is way newer than the Google Pixel 2, it's notably heavier and a bit thicker. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a much bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a way better video definition, a camera in the back with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a much larger sensor capturing much higher quality photos.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 70 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.