Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a score of 81.9, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 2's 81.6 score. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo construction is incredibly newer, but a little thicker and somewhat heavier than Google Pixel 2. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a lot better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a just a little better number of pixels per inch in the display, a better 1256 x 2760px resolution and a bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has much more memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Google Pixel 2 features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4310mAh battery size against 2700mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a way better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a much better resolution camera and a much larger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.