Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 2's general score of 81.6. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is extremely newer than Google Pixel 2's, although it is incredibly heavier and a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 2 features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a little bit worse pixel count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a way larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes greater videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot larger back camera sensor, a back facing camera with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution, better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a larger aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has 384 GB more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.