Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPS |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than the Moto G 5G's overall score of 81.5. Even though Google Pixel 2 is incredibly older than Moto G 5G, it's construction is notably thinner and noticeably lighter. Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G 5G. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor.
Google Pixel 2 has a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Moto G 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a camera with lot more megapixels.
Motorola Moto G 5G features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G 5G features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.