Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is slightly better than the Moto G Power's 76.1 score. Google Pixel 2's construction is notably lighter and thinner than the Moto G Power, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Google Pixel 2 features a bit more vivid display than Moto G Power, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power. They have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM. Motorola Moto G Power counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Power captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Moto G Power counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85 percent more battery size.
The Google Pixel 2 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.