Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is a bit better than Moto G Stylus (2021)'s 79.3 general score. Google Pixel 2's construction is way lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G Stylus (2021), although it was released 3 years before. Google Pixel 2 features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 2 has a little faster processor than Moto G Stylus (2021). Both have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cores.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) features a superior camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a larger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features a way better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 48% larger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 2 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.