Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-04-27 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than the Moto G60, with an 81.6 score against 79.5. The Google Pixel 2 body is much thinner and extremely lighter than Moto G60, although it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 2 has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Moto G60 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G60's processing unit is just as good as the CPU in Google Pixel 2, both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM.
The Motorola Moto G60 takes way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G60 also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Moto G60 has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.