Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cosmic blue and Crystal pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 14.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than Moto G8 Plus, having an 81.6 score against 77.6. Google Pixel 2's design is thinner and notably lighter than the Moto G8 Plus, although it was released many years before. Google Pixel 2 has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G8 Plus. They have 8 cpu cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 has a little more vivid display than Moto G8 Plus, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixel density. The Moto G8 Plus features more storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Moto G8 Plus counts with a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 48% larger battery capacity. The Moto G8 Plus has a much better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto G8 Plus also has a larger diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution and a much larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.