Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G8 Power's overall score of 76. Google Pixel 2 is an incredibly older phone than Motorola Moto G8 Power, but it is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better CPU than Moto G8 Power. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Google Pixel 2 has a little more vivid screen than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel count in each inch in the display. The Moto G8 Power has a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G8 Power shoots a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Google Pixel 2 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.