Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-09-07 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the Moto G9 Plus's general score of 80.5. The Google Pixel 2 design is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G9 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Google Pixel 2 has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G9 Plus. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 features a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. The Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G9 Plus counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85% more battery size. Moto G9 Plus has a much better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the Moto G9 Plus also has a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a much bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.