Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2016-07-28 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with an 81.6 score against 76.4. The Google Pixel 2 construction is newer and lighter, but just a little thicker than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition. Google Pixel 2 has a little bit better performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Google Pixel 2 also has a greater number of cores.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a quite better pixel count per screen inch, a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a bit larger screen. Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a back facing camera with much more MP.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.