Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPS |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace is slightly better than Google Pixel 2, with a general score of 81.6 against 81.6. Motorola One 5G Ace is a newer cellphone than Google Pixel 2, although it is incredibly thicker and heavier. Google Pixel 2 features a bit better screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a way smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixels density.
Motorola One 5G Ace features a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Google Pixel 2 has a little faster processor than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores.
The Motorola One 5G Ace shoots better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a bigger camera aperture and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution. The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2700mAh.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Motorola One 5G Ace, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 2, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.