Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than the Motorola One Action, having a general score of 81.6 against 78.5. Google Pixel 2 is an older cellphone than Motorola One Action, but Google was able to build it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Google Pixel 2 has a bit better processing unit than Motorola One Action. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a much smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixels number in each inch of display. Google Pixel 2 has a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Google Pixel 2 also has a back facing camera with more mega pixels.
The Motorola One Action counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola One Action also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Action counts with greater battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
The Google Pixel 2 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.