Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is slightly better than Motorola One Hyper's score of 79.8. Google Pixel 2 is an a lot older phone than Motorola One Hyper, but Google was able to make it way lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola One Hyper. They have 8 cores and the same RAM amount.
The Google Pixel 2 features a slightly better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little better number of pixels per inch of display. Motorola One Hyper shoots better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
The Google Pixel 2 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.