Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than the Motorola One Vision, getting a general score of 81.6 against 80.7. Google Pixel 2's body is just a bit thinner and lighter than Motorola One Vision, although it was released just a bit more than a year before. Google Pixel 2 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
Motorola One Vision features a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 2 features a bit superior processor than Motorola One Vision. Both have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Motorola One Vision has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh. Motorola One Vision features a much better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has a lot larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos, a back facing camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.