Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than Motorola One Zoom, getting a general score of 81.6 against 80. Google Pixel 2's construction is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola One Zoom, even though it was released just a little further than a year before. Google Pixel 2 has a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a much smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater screen density.
Google Pixel 2 counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Zoom. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a bigger aperture and a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and videos.
Motorola One Zoom has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Zoom also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 128 GB. Motorola One Zoom counts with a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 48% greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 2 is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.