Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 2's 81.6 overall score. The Motorola razr (2020) is a noticeably heavier phone than the Google Pixel 2, but they are 0.31inches thick. Motorola razr (2020) features a little better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 features a bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher display density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px. The Motorola razr (2020) features a much better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture and a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has more internal memory capacity. Motorola razr (2020) has a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4 percent more battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), else you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 2, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.