Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-11-12 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW's overall score of 80.3. Google Pixel 2's construction is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, even though it was released 3 years before. Google Pixel 2 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a really smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a processing unit that is just as good as the Google Pixel 2 one, and although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a larger amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 2 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.