Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 global score. Google Pixel 2 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than the Nokia 9 PureView, but both are equally thin. The Nokia 9 PureView features a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a bigger screen, a little higher amount of pixels in each inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Nokia 9 PureView's storage for games and applications is just as good as the Google Pixel 2 one, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3320mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh. Google Pixel 2 takes clearer photographs and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Google Pixel 2 also has a bigger back camera sensor and a more megapixels camera in the back.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 2 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.