Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than Nokia XR20, having a general score of 81.6 against 80.8. Google Pixel 2 is an a lot older phone than Nokia XR20, but it's notably lighter and notably thinner anyway. Nokia XR20 counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a bit lower quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a much bigger screen.
Nokia XR20 counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Nokia XR20 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 2 features just a little better performance than Nokia XR20, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Nokia XR20 counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity. The Nokia XR20 shoots better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same video definition, the Nokia XR20 also has a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos, higher video frame rates and a much higher 48 MP resolution camera.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Google Pixel 2 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.