Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 score. Even though the Google Pixel 2 is notably older and just a little thicker than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a larger display. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a much larger back camera sensor which offers a way better image and video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and video.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 49% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.